This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilise.

Apple tree is not the tiptop seller of smartphones in the world — not even shut. It does, however, accept the vast bulk of smartphone profits in the world with an estimated 90%. The margins on Apple tree's hardware are so large that it can out earn OEMs that sell several times as many phones. There's been a lot of talk almost encouraging the manufacturing of electronics in the US with the incoming Trump administration, but is it even feasible to build an iPhone in the U.s.? If Apple built them in the United states of america, would that really create many jobs?

Information technology is estimated that the iPhone 7 costs about $400 for Apple to produce. It sells for $649 in the US. A large chunk of the cost of making the phone has to do with getting components to the factories in China'due south Zhengzhou region, a historically poor area that has been congenital up and perfectly tuned to churn out iPhones. This farthermost specialization is 1 reason iPhone production would be very difficult to practice cheaply in the U.s.a..

Analysts accept pointed out that when you lot figure in the increased wages for a United states-based assembly functioning, the cost of building an iPhone might only rise by 5%. I recall that's an amount that many people would be willing to pay. However, that adding ignores many of the logistical issues.

Foxconn

Co-ordinate to the New York Times, the Foxconn facilities in Zhengzhou can produce 500,000 iPhones per mean solar day. Foxconn has gotten to this betoken with the assistance of local government grants and subsidies totaling about $ane.v billion. The company has built huge facilities and employee dorms, and the government has added in infrastructure of its own. It laid down new roads and fifty-fifty built an airport just a few miles away from the manufacturing plant to streamline the exporting process. It'south not unheard of for municipalities in the US to offer incentives to businesses that desire to aggrandize, merely null on this scale. Apple tree has a sweet deal in Communist china that it simply wouldn't get in the US.

The next problem in moving iPhone product stateside comes in really getting the components here. Currently, Apple has nearly 800 suppliers for iPhone components, and almost half of them are in China. The vast bulk of the others are in Asian countries. The logistics of getting all those parts to the US would add great expense beyond simply paying workers more. These supply chains have been built from the ground upwards to serve a Chinese manufacturing machine.

Foxconn's Foxbots are being deployed by the tens of thousands in part to replace some of its one million workers

Let's just say that Apple decides to build a new mill in the United states to assemble iPhones, and it somehow figures out how to do it without adding too much to the price. It might not result in equally many jobs as politicians would like to think. Even in Cathay where labor is cheap, Foxconn is kickoff to apply robots to replace human workers. In the The states, a new factory would undoubtedly be highly automated, limiting potential employment. Building iPhones in the Us might sound nice, and it makes for adept political rhetoric, merely it's not a silver bullet to create jobs. Smartphones has we know them were devised with Chinese manufacturing and Asian supply chains in mind. The cost of labor is only the first hurdle that would been to be cleared. Different US policies could bring some manufacturing jobs back, but automation is one of the major reasons those jobs don't exist anymore — and no tariff policy or homegrown manufacturing initiative can easily change that.